KR2025Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and ReasoningProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Melbourne, Australia. November 11-17, 2025.

Edited by

ISSN: 2334-1033
ISBN: 978-1-956792-08-9

Sponsored by
Published by

Copyright © 2025 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization

How Lucky Are You to Know Your Way? A Probabilistic Approach to Knowing How Logics

  1. Pablo F. Castro(Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, FCEFQyN, Departamento de Computación, Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina)
  2. Pedro R. D'Argenio(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, FAMAF, Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina)
  3. Raul Fervari(Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, FAMAF, Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles, France)

Keywords

  1. Knowing How
  2. Probabilistic Reasoning
  3. Abilities
  4. Logic
  5. Model-Checking
  6. Decidability
  7. Complexity

Abstract

We introduce a probabilistic version of knowing-how modal logics. More precisely, our logics extend extant approaches to model the ability of an agent to achieve a given goal with a certain probability. On the semantic side, we enrich the models of the logic with probability distributions over the agent's actions. Then, we investigate different languages to describe such structures. First, we consider a probabilistic version of the linear plan-based logic of knowing how, and discuss its properties. Then, we consider indistinguishability classes, and obtain two logics, one that has `non-adaptative' plans, and another with `adaptative' plans. In all cases we investigate the computational complexity of their model-checking problem, obtaining undecidability results for the first and the second logic, while for the last one the problem is decidable in polynomial time. We also explore the semantics of the new logics under non-probabilistic models to compare them to the original non-probabilistic ones.