KR2024Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and ReasoningProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Hanoi, Vietnam. November 2-8, 2024.

Edited by

ISSN: 2334-1033
ISBN: 978-1-956792-05-8

Sponsored by
Published by

Copyright © 2024 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization

Learning to Ground Existentially Quantified Goals

  1. Martin Funkquist(Linköping University)
  2. Simon Ståhlberg(RWTH Aachen University)
  3. Hector Geffner(RWTH Aachen University)

Keywords

  1. Planning and ML-General

Abstract

Goal instructions for autonomous AI agents cannot assume that objects have unique names. Instead, objects in goals must be referred to by providing suitable descriptions. However, this raises problems in both classical planning and generalized planning. The standard approach to handling existentially quantified goals in classical planning involves compiling them into a DNF formula that encodes all possible variable bindings and adding dummy actions to map each DNF term into the new, dummy goal. This preprocessing is exponential in the number of variables. In generalized planning, the problem is different: even if general policies can deal with any initial situation and goal, executing a general policy requires the goal to be grounded to define a value for the policy features. The problem of grounding goals, namely finding the objects to bind the goal variables, is subtle: it is a generalization of classical planning, which is a special case when there are no goal variables to bind, and constraint reasoning, which is a special case when there are no actions. In this work, we address the goal grounding problem with a novel supervised learning approach. A GNN architecture, trained to predict the cost of partially quantified goals over small domain instances is tested on larger instances involving more objects and different quantified goals. The proposed architecture is evaluated experimentally over several planning domains where generalization is tested along several dimensions including the number of goal variables and objects that can bind such variables. The scope of the approach is also discussed in light of the known relationship between GNNs and C₂ logics.